Manualized Assessment and Treatment Model of Challenging Behavior
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Summary
Despite decades of mounting single-case-design evidence for the efficacy of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and other approaches for the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior, an evidence-based comprehensive approach remains to exist. The current study will collect test the efficacy of a standardized manual for assessing and treating challenging behavior for individuals with severe and mild challenging behavior.
Description
The investigators will stratify participants according to the severity of their challenging behavior (harmful or milder forms of challenging behavior). Criteria for Harmful Challenging Behavior Participants will be classified as exhibiting harmful challenging behavior if they meet all the following criteria and as exhibiting milder challenging behavior if they do not meet all these criteria. 1. The child displays one or more of the following challenging behaviors (operationally defined on the Destructive Behavior Severity Scale, see attached) daily: (a) aggression, (b) elopement, (c) injury…
Eligibility
- Age range
- 3–17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria: 1. children from ages 3 to 17; 2. challenging behavior that occurs at least 10 times a day, despite previous treatment; 3. challenging behavior maintained by social positive or automatic reinforcement; 4. stable protective supports for self-injurious behavior (e.g., helmet) with no anticipated changes during enrollment; 5. on a stable psychoactive drug regimen for at least 10 half-lives per drug or drug free; 6. stable educational plan and placement with no anticipated changes during the child's treatment. Exclusion Criteria: 1. patients who do not meet the inclusion cri…
Interventions
- BehavioralFunctional Communication Training (FCT)
During FCT, reinforcement will be discontinued for challenging behavior and only the alternative communication response will be reinforced. For participants with challenging behavior determined to be maintained by social-positive reinforcement (attention and/or tangible), the investigators also will typically recommend using a multiple schedule FCT (mult-FCT) to signal when reinforcement is available and to thin the schedule of reinforcement to render the treatment more practical for caregivers to implement. For participants with challenging behavior determined to be maintained by social-negative reinforcement (escape), the investigators will recommend using a chained schedule FCT (chained-FCT).
- BehavioralNon-Contingent Reinforcement (NCR)
During NCR, the investigators will deliver the functional and competing reinforcers on time-based schedules and use multiple and chained schedules to signal when noncontingent reinforcement is available (similar to multiple- and chained-FCT).
- BehavioralCompeting Items and Response Blocking
The investigators will conduct a competing stimulus assessment (CSA) to identify items that produce at least an 80% reduction in challenging behavior when the participant is engaged with them. The investigators will evaluate conditions in which participants have free access to the item(s), when engagement with the item(s) is prompted, and when challenging behavior is physically blocked. Treatment will include one or more of the following components: non-contingent reinforcement informed by the CSA, reinforcing adaptive behavior, and blocking challenging behavior. The investigators will also use multiple and chained schedules to thin the reinforcement schedules and increase the practicality of the this treatment. The ending duration of the S-delta component will be based on input from caregivers and the participant's school personnel.
Location
- Children's Specialized Hospital-Rutgers University Center for Autism Research, Education, and ServicesSomerset, New Jersey