A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bomedemstat (MK-3543) Versus Hydroxyurea in Cytoreductive Therapy Naïve Essential Thrombocythemia Participants
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bomedemstat compared with hydroxyurea in cytoreductive therapy naïve essential thrombocythemia (ET) participants for whom cytoreductive therapy is indicated. Its primary objective is to compare bomedemstat to hydroxyurea with respect to durable clinicohematologic response (DCHR). The primary hypothesis is that bomedemstat is superior to hydroxyurea with respect to DCHR.
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18+ years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) based on World Health Organization Criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms, and an indication for cytoreductive therapy regardless of age or risk status * Has a centrally assessed bone marrow fibrosis score of Grade 0 or Grade 1, as per a modified version of the European Consensus Criteria for Grading Myelofibrosis * Has received no prior cytoreductive treatment for their ET * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected participants have well controlled HIV on antiretroviral therapy * Participants who are Hepatitis B surface…
Interventions
- DrugBomedemstat
Oral capsule
- DrugHydroxyurea
Oral capsule
- DrugBomedemstat placebo
Oral capsule placebo
- DrugHydroxyurea placebo
Oral capsule placebo
Locations (167)
- Palo Verde Cancer Specialists ( Site 0052)Glendale, Arizona
- Los Angeles Cancer Network ( Site 0025)Glendale, California
- Stanford Cancer Center ( Site 0024)Palo Alto, California
- Exempla Lutheran Medical Center ( Site 0014)Golden, Colorado
- Yale University School of Medicine ( Site 0051)New Haven, Connecticut
- Parkview Research Center at Parkview Regional Medical Center ( Site 0006)Fort Wayne, Indiana