Maintaining the Acute Therapeutic Effect of rTMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression (Maitr-De)
University of California, San Diego
Summary
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet substantial uncertainties persist regarding its efficacy as a maintenance treatment. This prospective study seeks to investigate the efficacy of maintenance rTMS in individuals with TRD who have previously responded to an acute course of rTMS. In the R61 phase of the study, we will recruit 75 participants across three study sites, the University of California San Diego, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Australian National University, into a double-blind, three-arm maintenance treatment trial. In this trial, participants will be randomized to receive either standard maintenance rTMS, clustered maintenance rTMS, or sham maintenance rTMS for a duration of 6 months. Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period. We will also assess changes in depressive symptom severity using clinical scales, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as a secondary outcome measure. It is hypothesized that stimulation with clustered maintenance rTMS will demonstrate superiority in sustaining DLPFC-SGC connectivity compared with standard maintenance rTMS and sham maintenance rTMS
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18–80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: 1. They met criteria for a DSM-5 diagnosis of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) during the index episode of depression for which they have received an acute rTMS treatment course. 2. Meet criteria for either response or remission from their initial depressive illness. The MINI assessment timeline will be adjusted to allow scoring of illness symptoms prior to rTMS response. Response to acute course of treatment is defined as either a MADRS score of \<10, or a MADRS score of 10-19, plus evidence of having met response criteria on either the MADRS or another structured depress…
Interventions
- DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Standard maintenance rTMS:
In this approach, patients who were treated with rTMS five days per week during their acute episode receive less frequent treatments during a taper period (for example treatment three days per week followed by two sessions per week) with a gradual transition into a maintenance schedule. For example, the maintenance schedule might begin with a single weekly session for one or two months and then the intensity is reduced to one session every two weeks (and possibly then one session every three or four weeks).
- DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Clustered maintenance rTMS:
Clustered maintenance rTMS typically involves around 4 TMS sessions applied over 2 days, at 1-month intervals. Our team initially developed this approach based upon preclinical TMS studies (for example (Maeda et al. 2000)) suggesting that rTMS treatment effects may accumulate when applied over multiple sessions in a shorter period of time (Maeda et al. 2000).
- DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) -- Sham maintenance rTMS
Sham treatment will be administered as either standard or clustered maintenance rTMS for 6 months period using a sham coil. The intervention target will be located via a Brainsight TMS Navigator (Brainsight, Montreal, Canada). For safety reasons, the individual TMS intensity will be limited to 130% of the individual resting motor threshold.
Locations (3)
- University of California, San DiegoSan Diego, California
- Weill Cornell MedicineNew York, New York
- Australian National UniversityCanberra, Australian Capital Territory