A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Elritercept Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in ESA-naïve Adult Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Takeda
Summary
The main aim of this study is to assess how elritercept works in lowering the need for RBC (red blood cell) transfusions and how safe elritercept is when compared with epoetin alfa. Other aims are to learn if elritercept improves tiredness as reported by participants without needing RBC transfusion compared with epoetin alfa, the RBC transfusion burden and quality of life compared with epoetin alfa. The study also aims to find out the extent of the immune response to elritercept. The study will also check on the medical problems (safety) of elritercept.
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18+ years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria 1. Male or female participants aged ≥ 18 years or older at time of signing the informed consent form (ICF). 2. Able to understand the purpose and risks of the trial and voluntarily sign an ICF prior to any trial-related procedures being conducted and authorization to use protected health information and personal data in accordance to national and local privacy regulations. 3. Documented diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome(s) (MDS) according to WHO 2016 classification that meets International Prognostic Scoring System - Revised (IPSS-R) classification of very low-, low-, o…
Interventions
- DrugElritercept
Elritercept, SC, injection.
- DrugEpoetin Alfa
Epoetin Alfa SC injection.
Locations (146)
- Hematology-Oncology Medical Group of Orange County, Inc - Orange - 1010 W. La Veta AvenueOrange, California
- BRCR Medical Center IncTamarac, Florida
- Emory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia
- Orchard Healthcare Research Inc. (OHR) - SkokieSkokie, Illinois
- Norton Cancer InstituteLouisville, Kentucky
- American Oncology Partners P.A. MidAmerica Cancer CareKansas City, Missouri