Robotic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lucas Beffa
Summary
This is a randomized trial comparing open retromuscular ventral hernia repair to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair.
Description
This is a randomized trial comparing open retromuscular ventral hernia repair to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. This is a superiority trial with a primary outcome of length of stay in the hospital, theorizing that robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repairs are superior to open ventral hernia repairs by reducing length of stay by 24 hours. Patients will be blinded to the intervention, groups will be in parallel, and the primary outcome (when the patient is discharged) will be determined by a blinded assessor.
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18+ years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years and older * 7 cm to 15 cm wide hernia midline defects * BMI less than or equal to 45 * Patient deemed both an open and robotic candidate by operating surgeon Exclusion Criteria: * 17 years old or younger * prisoners * pregnant patients * Emergent patients * BMI greater than 45 * Hernia defects less than 7 cm or greater than 15 cm in width
Interventions
- ProcedureVentral Hernia Repair
Patients will undergo retromuscular ventral hernia repair
Locations (4)
- University of Florida HealthGainesville, Florida
- Cleveland ClinicCleveland, Ohio
- Prisma Health Greenville Memorial HospitalGreenville, South Carolina
- University of Tennessee Medical Center, KnoxvilleKnoxville, Tennessee