Comparing the Effects of Pneumatic Compression and Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Muscle Recovery
University of Southern California
Summary
Both BFR and intermittent pneumatic compression are purported to decrease symptoms associated with exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) that cause delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Blood flow restriction relies on applying pressurized cuffs to the most proximal portion of the limb. Another form of recovery often relied upon is pneumatic compression. The mechanism by which pneumatic compression works is similar to that of a massage, whereby the device progressively increases the pressure on a portion of the limb before releasing and moving further up the limb.The purpose of this study is determine whether BFR or pneumatic compression can be used to decreased DOMS which may indicate enhanced recovery.
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18–30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria: * 18-30 years of age * Recreationally active population * Women should be on a form of hormonal contraception. * No current musculoskeletal injuries or pathologies * Must answer "yes" to all PAR-Q questions. Exclusion Criteria: * Individuals that routinely train trail running * Discomfort when running * Deep vein thrombosis * Blood clots * Cancerous lesions * Sensory or mental impairment * Unstable fractures * Acute pulmonary edema * Acute thrombophlebitis * Acute congestive cardiac failure * Acute infections * Episodes of pulmonary embolism * Wounds, lesions, infection,…
Interventions
- DevicePneumatic Compression
Following downhill running protocol, participants will complete 20 minutes of pneumatic compression at 100 mmHg.
- DeviceBlood Flow Restriction
Following the downhill running protocol, participants will complete 4 rounds of treatment: 3 minutes at 100% resting limb occlusion pressure, 2 minutes of 0% resting limb occlusion pressure.
Location
- University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, California