Comparison of Non-Invasive Wearable Sensors to Radial Arterial Catheterization on Human Subjects
Vena Vitals
Summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the VeriTrack non-invasive blood pressure monitor compared to radial arterial catheterization in adult surgical patients. The main question it aims to answer is: How well does VeriTrack measure continuous blood pressure compared to an arterial catheter? Researchers will compare VeriTrack readings to arterial line measurements to determine if the VeriTrack provides comparable accuracy and clinical utility. Participants will wear the VeriTrack device during surgery and have a radial arterial catheter placed as part of standard care.
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18+ years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients whose blood pressure will be monitored using an arterial line during their procedure * Patients who have a palpable dorsalis pedis pulse Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have non-palpable dorsalis pedis pulses * Patients whose limbs are inaccessible for placement of Vena Vitals Wearable * Patients with known allergy to adhesives and/or silicone
Interventions
- DeviceNon-invasive Blood Pressure Monitor
Application of the VeriTrack non-invasive blood pressure monitor
Location
- Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania