Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Neck Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervical Spinal Manipulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Baylor University
Summary
Neck pain is a common issue that can lead to long-term disability and lost work time for many individuals. Despite numerous studies, finding effective treatment strategies has been challenging. One possible reason for this is that treatments may not have been tested on the specific groups of people who would benefit most. A method was developed to identify people with neck pain who are likely to see significant improvements from a manipulation technique used by physical therapists, called cervical spine thrust joint manipulation. The investigators believe that patients identified as likely responders to cervical spine manipulation will show greater improvements in disability. The investigators aim to test whether this method works with different patients and therapists across the country through a multicenter randomized clinical trial. In this study, 160 patients with primary complaints of neck pain will be enrolled from 9 clinical sites. Designed with stringent criteria for inclusion, this study is a testament to our commitment to participant safety and the effectiveness of the treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) one group will receive 2 sessions of cervical spine manipulation followed by 3 sessions of exercise, and (2) the other group will receive 2 sessions of gentle hands-on treatment followed by 3 sessions of exercise. The primary goal is to measure changes in disability 4 weeks after starting treatment, with follow-ups after one week, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to assess both immediate and long-term effects. By providing crucial data on the reliability of our method in identifying patients who will benefit most from cervical spine manipulation, this study has the potential to significantly enhance decision-making leading to rapid improvement. Results from this study will provide clearer guidelines on the optimal use of cervical spine manipulation, potentially revolutionizing the way patients recover from neck pain.
Description
This study's primary objective will examine whether a previously derived clinical prediction rule (CPR) exhibits validity for identifying a subgroup of patients who respond favorably to cervical thrust joint manipulation (C-TJM). The secondary objective will determine if patients who are positive on the derived CPR and receive C-TJM will exhibit reduced downstream healthcare costs. This multicenter randomized clinical trial will enroll 160 patients with primary complaints of neck pain. Participants will be randomized into two groups: (1) 2 sessions of C-TJM followed by 3 sessions of stretching…
Eligibility
- Age range
- 18–70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Ages 18 to 70 * Primary complaint of neck pain with or without unilateral upper extremity symptoms * Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 10 or greater * Numeric Pain Rating Scale score of 2 or greater Exclusion Criteria: * History of whiplash injury within the past 6 weeks * Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis * Bilateral upper extremity symptoms * Red flags noted in the patient's Neck Medical Screening Questionnaire (i.e. tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, severe atherosclerosis, dizziness, diplopia, drop attacks, bilateral numbness, nausea, prolo…
Interventions
- ProcedureCervical Manipulation
High velocity low amplitude thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spine facet joints
- ProcedureExercise
Therapeutic exercises to the cervical, thoracic, and scapular musculature
- ProcedureMobilization
Low velocity, low amplitude movements applied to the cervical spine facet joints (Grade I or II)
Locations (4)
- ActivePTRochester, Minnesota
- PROActivePTSyracuse, New York
- ActiveTherapy AllianceWaco, Texas
- Emplify by Bellin Health AshwaubenonGreen Bay, Wisconsin