London School of Economics and Political Science
This nationally representative randomized survey of US adults will evaluate the effect of using brief statements to communicate different sources of uncertainty about the benefits and harms of new cancer drugs on participants' decisions and understanding.
Many newer cancer drugs are approved before uncertainties with their underlying clinical trial evidence have been adequately studied, in turn making it difficult to accurately determine the drug's benefits and harms. Prescription drug information rarely communicates these uncertainties. In a nationally representative sample of US adults, this study will evaluate the effect of using brief statements to communicate different sources of uncertainty about the benefits and harms of new cancer drugs on participants' decisions and understanding. In the pre-intervention phase, participants will be gi…
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults 18 years of age and older * Adults fluent in English * Adults residing in the United States Exclusion Criteria: * Participants who do not meet each of the 3 inclusion criteria
Because Zenova has not been compared to other treatments, it is unknown if Zenova is better, the same, or worse than other treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.
Since patients given Zenova were followed for a short time, the longer-term benefits and harms of taking Zenova are unknown.
Zenova has not been studied in patients similar to Alex (patients with her race and ethnicity). It is unknown whether Zenova will work and what harms it will have for patients like her.
Zenova has only been shown to shrink the size of tumors. It is unknown whether Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live.
It is unknown whether patients with non-small cell lung cancer will notice an improvement with Zenova.
Arctuva estimate
Verify or correct the compensation shown for this listing.