A Randomized Trial Comparing Anatomic And Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement For Shoulder Arthritis With An Intact Rotator Cuff
Mayo Clinic
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) will have improved patient reported outcome scores at 1 year compared to those undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).
Eligibility
- Age range
- 60–85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria * Shoulder arthritis * Intact rotator cuff * Glenoid retroversion less than 25° Exclusion Criteria * Rotator cuff insufficiency * Fracture deformity/sequelae * Severe glenoid deformity (C glenoid, severe A2, B2 glenoid) * Current or previous infection of shoulder * Previous acromion fracture (not os acromiale) * Brachial plexopathy * Axillary neuropathy * Current drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements. * Inability or unwillingness of individual or legal guardian/representative t…
Interventions
- ProcedureaTSA
Patients with shoulder arthritis with an intact rotator cuff that requires surgical correction will undergo anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) procedure.
- ProcedurerTSA
Patients with shoulder arthritis with an intact rotator cuff that requires surgical correction will undergo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) procedure.
Location
- Mayo Clinic in RochesterRochester, Minnesota